Forensic construction and technical expertise is a key The importance tool for protecting rights in construction cases.
There are quite a few legal tools that can help you defend yourself and The importance defend your case in a construction lawsuit. One such tool as evidence is a forensic construction and technical examination! according to which! by court order! a forensic expert conducts a study to provide answers to the question specified in the ruling.
This is exactly the situation I recently had in one of my client’s country email list cases in the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv. According to which I see a prospect of proving the client’s case in court! including according to the conclusion of an expert study as a result of conducting the relevant examination! which I will talk about.
Conducting a judicial construction and technical examination is a key way to prove
The importance case in many cases. Now! using the example of a court case! I will show how to use this tool! what document the court accepts! and why this type of examination is needed in a construction case.
In the case! I am the representative of the plaintiff as one of the co-owners of an apartment in an apartment building! in which the co-owners learned about the loss of the attic in the building (about 290 sq m)! since the attic was transferred to the property of a third party under an investment agreement and subsequently sold to the lyudmila tyazhelnikova told whether top managers defendant in the case. The co-owners of the building did not agree to the specified transfer of ownership! which is why we are currently on trial.
According to the prepared and filed lawsuit I asked the court:
1. To declare the Investment Agreement between the State Self-financing Organization “Housing-Invest” and LLC invalid.
2. To declare invalid the order of the Main Department of Housing of the Executive Body of the Kyiv City State Administration (KCSA).
3. To invalidate the certificate of ownership of non-residential premises ao lists issued in the name of the LLC.
4. To declare the contract of sale of non-residential premises between the LLC and the defendant invalid.
5. To cancel in the state register of real rights the decision of the private notary of the Kyiv City Notary District of Kyiv! Oksana Vasylivna Maydybur! on the state registration of rights and their encumbrances.
6. Restore the technical attic to its original condition prior to the reconstruction! according to the technical passport.
7. To reclaim the attic from the defendant in favor of the plaintiff and other co-owners of the house.