We will no doubt have the opportunity to reread carefully the subtle distinctions not by Anne Lysy to approach the “A non autre pareil” receiv by the Commission de la passe The interpretation . There is the method: it responds to the rigor of the construction of the fantasy.
which supposes follow the meers of the truth, without gett lost in it. But if they do not “want to give in on elucidation [9] ” the members of the commission must submit to the discipline of listen that dismisses reason.
The question address by Anne
does not aim to resolve the incongruity of the fault that is reveal when the disjunction between what could have been construct in the analysis, the opacity of jouissance, takes the form of “oddities”. The paradox is mobile database only appearance: these oddities are “irreplaceable”, the incomparable lies in the way in which they lend themselves, in the language of the subject, to transformations. Deposit in the pass, in the School, this private language shapes a style. It allows one to continue the work to know how to lodge oneself in the faults, “without panic”, but with resolution.
the essence of analytic discourse ( the act ) is not action; to a certain extent it is oppos to political social action. We can measure this in the life of the School; it is rather a dialectic, a beauty salon market: secrets to attract customers temporal beat: the continuous movement of psychoanalysis suddenly condenses into dazzl moments that throw us into action. They correspond to phases of awaken. They are not constant, while the monitor devices that condition action should be permanent.
>It is therefore a question of know how to take advantage of what we have seen heard, shortly after a recent new battle.
the dialectic of suspicion proof
Current health policies clearly demonstrate that practitioners are caught in the era of suspicion. The methodical distrust that weighs under the registers of “good practices” the ne for evaluation makes them suspect. Suspicion calls for justification on the basis of evidence is all the more insistent when one shirks be numbers provid it, hence the close interweav between evidence suspicion. But this suspicion very often presents itself as an element of a negative transfer, a transfer of hatr: this is in line with what analytical experience teaches, the lift of repression. The deconstruction of semblances is always paid for with a return of aggression (lesson of psychoanalysis).